policy is a large sector of our economy, yet the Cheney report clearly states that
there is no coherent policy in place to stabilize growing concerns
over Americas energy needs...
Note: PDF files require Acrobat Reader.
by Steven M. Greer
Director, The Disclosure Project
Time To Pull Together
The public must wake up sooner than
ever. Hoagland's team findings with DP, when seen together is
in my opinion, full disclosure. By not isolating Richard's
predictive scientific research and its sweeping implications
(Mars - Moon findings) from the obvious further disclosures, we
are in for some incredibly spectacular confessions. After those
confessions will come deserved and long overdue debate, and
proofings of their testimonies. Ultimately, there will be demonstrations
of the technologies purported now to be on par with more advanced alien/human
physics. Ideally of course. And everyone will see for themselves.
As the superpower, our compassion for
the whole human race will be on trial, hopefully as never before,
perhaps dramatically culminating in a final battle, ostensibly
before a Rapajmal can be organized. A passing of the torch
will ensue. The powers that be (from secret corporations, para-military
cliques, to mafia, and organized crime (oil, gas, drugs, slavery,
etc)) will cast their lot in open retaliation for pure greed and
purposes of a personal power struggle. Passing the monetary flame
of powers from one family to another, as the structures edified
and constructed upon covert and ill gotten money begin to
fall. Our hopes and intentions should be on forever controlling
the war dogs and the power hungry dictators who will only continue
to war on peaceful citizens if unchallenged. Our true military and
elected government must quickly, and decisively, organize a
seizure of assets and freeze bank accounts of these super-black,
clandestine, self-sustaining, micro monarchies. I also see in this
last battle the use of terrible weapons, and not just of
conventional order, but as discussed here: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/030202a.htm
We must seize power www.seaspower.com
from them in those coming days. We must gain back the steering
wheel, the compass, and at long last, the aetheric wind will once
again fill the sails of the entire human race.
the War Industry into a World-Cooperative Space Economy
1. Banning Space-based Weapons
Achieving an enforceable,
permanent ban on space-based weapons is of immediate importance at
this moment in history while it is within our practical reach --
before weapons are deployed into space. On June 13, 2002 the
Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty will expire following President
Bush’s unilateral notice of abrogation on December 13, 2001. This
action will permit research, development, testing, manufacturing,
production and deployment of space-based weapons, and components of
the National Missile Defense (NMD) System to go forward, instigating a
destabilizing, costly and dangerous arms race in space. The latest
estimates are that the NMD system -- which is partly space-based –
will to cost up to $238 billion.
Most leaders of the world are on
record as wanting to ban space-based weapons. On April 12, 2001, U.N.
Secretary General Kofi Annan announced his support of a ban on
space-based weapons. Secretary General Annan stated that the
international community recognized early on that a legal regime for
outer space was needed to prevent space from becoming another arena of
military confrontation. On November 29, 2001, the U.N. General
Assembly approved by a 156-0 vote the basis for a treaty establishing
a permanent ban on space-based weapons (Resolution 56/535). The
Resolution stated that the Member Nations were “convinced that
further measures should be examined in the search for effective and
verifiable, bilateral and multilateral agreements in order to prevent
an arms race in outer space, including the weaponization of outer
space.” On November 20, 2000, a similar U.N. General Assembly
resolution to prevent an arms race in space (Resolution 55/32) was
approved where the final adopting vote was 163-0.
Key space-faring nation leaders
have publicly stated they are in favor of banning space-based weapons.
Deputy Prime Minister John Manley of Canada on July 26, 2001 stated,
“Canada would be very happy…to launch an initiative to see an
international convention preventing the weaponization of space.”
Canada first called for a ban on space-based weapons 20 years ago in
1982 and again in 1998 and 1999.
On September 28, 2001, just two
weeks after the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center, in a major
speech at the United Nations in New York, Russia’s Foreign Minister
Igor Ivanov stated, “Russia invites the world community to start
working out a comprehensive agreement on the non-deployment of weapons
in outer space and on the non-use of force against space objects. As
the first practical step in this direction, a moratorium could be
declared on the deployment of weapons in outer space pending a
relevant international agreement. Preventing the deployment of weapons
in outer space forms an important part of the set of measures designed
to ensure strategic stability.”
On June 6, 2001, China formally
proposed possible provisions of a “treaty on the prevention of the
weaponization of outer space.” China stated, “China is dedicated
to promoting the international community to negotiate and conclude an
international legal instrument on the prevention of the weaponization
of space and an arms race in outer space.”
The Space Preservation Treaty is
an effective and verifiable, multilateral agreement to prevent an arms
race and weaponization of outer space. The Treaty is unique in several
ways. Under the terms of the Treaty, each State Party having signed
the Treaty shall immediately work toward supporting other
non-signatory State Parties in signing, ratifying and implementing the
Treaty. Once three nations sign it and deposit it at the United
Nations depositary, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan is required to
report publicly to the U.N. General Assembly every 90 days on the
progress of implementing a permanent ban on space-based weapons and on
the progress of signing and ratifying of the Treaty by State Parties.
Once 20 nations have signed and ratified the Space Preservation
Treaty, it will go into force, the world space peacekeeping agency
will be funded and empowered to monitor and enforce the ban on
Article IV of the Space
Preservation Treaty provides that “Each State party to this Treaty
agrees to the establishment, funding, equipping and deployment of an
outer space peacekeeping agency, whose mission is to monitor outer
space and enforce the permanent ban of space-based weapons under this
Treaty.” Article VII of the Space Preservation Treaty provides that
“The provisions of Articles 1 and II of this Treaty shall apply to
all States, regardless of whether such States are signatures to this
Treaty.” In other words, the Space Preservation Treaty establishes
an agency to monitor and enforce the ban.
The Space Preservation Act of
2002 was introduced into the U.S. Congress as H.R. 3616 by Congressman
Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), Co-Chair of the House Space and Aviation
Caucus and Chair of the House Progressive Caucus, on January 23, 2002.
H.R. 3616 directs the President to work toward “negotiating,
adopting and implementing an international treaty banning space-based
weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space
that are in orbit.”
The Space Preservation Treaty is
compatible with the Space Preservation Act of 2002 (H.R. 3616) and is
presently circulating among nation-state leaders for signature.
Similar to H.R. 3616, the Space Preservation Treaty provides that
“Each State Party to this Treaty shall:
(1) implement a ban on
(2) implement a ban on the use
of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit;
(3) immediately order the
permanent termination of research and development, testing,
manufacturing, production and deployment of all space-based weapons
of such State Party.”
A forthcoming world-interactive
treaty signing – the “Possible Dream” Event – is designed to
be an interactive world media and community event, whereby the
nation-state leaders signing the Space Preservation Treaty will
empower a new cooperative reality for humankind -- a ban on
space-based weapons and the foundation of a cooperative world space
economy. The Possible Dream Event will be simultaneously broadcast via
satellite and the internet from various locations around the world,
presenting world leaders within a global community of artists,
children, scientists, musicians and others unveiling the vision of a
world-cooperative space economy.
World-Cooperative Space Economy
The Space Preservation Act of
2002 (H.R. 3616) and the compatible forthcoming Space Preservation
Treaty facilitate future public and private investment in non-weapons,
world cooperative space ventures, and the consequent stimulation of
the national and world economy. Section 6 of the Space Preservation
Act of 2002 specifically permits “the use of funds for:
(1) space exploration,
(2) space research and
(3) testing, manufacturing or
production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems;
(4) civil, commercial or
defense activities (including communications, navigation,
surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning or remote sensing) that
are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
The public and private
investment in non-weapons related space activities will open the way
to significant positive impacts in the national and world economies.
As jobs and investments expand to meet the demand for non-weapons,
clean and safe space-age technology, products and services can be
applied directly to solving urgent human and environmental issues.
Investment in non-weapons space capital goods and services that come
from space industries, businesses, labs, factories, space habitats,
space hotels and resorts, schools and universities, and farms create
economic multiplier effects which in turn can have positive impacts on
terrestrial and space-related jobs, training programs and an expanding
consumer and producer economy.
A space-based weapon is capital
good that does not itself produce jobs, goods and services. Whereas a
space factory, for example, is a capital good that in turn multiplies
the investment put into it by producing jobs, goods and services for
the growing space and terrestrial economy.
Banning space-based weapons will
create a new era of cooperative expansion in the context of a new
space paradigm by humankind as we evolve into the Universe, with
unprecedented benefits, opportunities and prosperity. By capping the
arms race in space, we can transform the war industry into a
cooperative world space industry. Humankinds’ future economic engine
lies in a non-weapons space economy based on space exploration, space
manufacture and space habitation. We can now feasibly
transform/convert the space-based weapons program and war industry
into a world cooperative civil, commercial and military space
industry, a space economy and an earth society that recognizes itself
as a society in space and provides solutions. As the collective
consciousness becomes aware and shifts, the nature of economics will
shift from war to peace. We will no longer experience wars as a
primary economic driver -- space will become the economic stimulus.
Instead of talking about a war to peace-time economy, we are talking
about a war to space economy, since the industry is already moving
into space. The bill and treaty will simply remove the mandate to
weaponize space, allowing the economy to flourish.
Time is of the essence. Securing
the future of humankind is more feasible right now before actual
weapons are placed in space. Refocusing the direction of our tax
dollars toward a new space paradigm (a new way of thinking) now will
create a new momentum, a new perspective, a new appreciation of the
innate power of transformation within all people.
Monday, June 24, 2002 9:48 PM
Subject: Close Encounters and
Spielberg's Timing of his 20 Part Abduction Series
It's interesting that Steven Bassett and
Richard Hoagland last night spoke about Spielberg's new 20 part series
on abductions etc., coming out in December 2002. Hoagland speculated
the timing of which is strategically planned, to push the reality of
what's going on.
Hoagland also mentioned Close Encounters of the Third Kind,
summarizing the crucial scene of the meeting with ETI @ Devils Tower.
The 5 musical tones that ET was transmitting was determined by the
French translating Cartographer as earth coordinates, remember,
longitude and latitude for Devils Tower?
Well, when Hoagland checked the actual coordinates, he discovered that
Spielberg was referring to the Face on Mars not Devil's Tower!
Can you imagine? So, what exactly does Spielberg know? He may know
enough to be a powerful media force to tell the true story and he's
spending 75 million dollars on his new series along with 25 million
for advertising it.
It is Richard's contention that Carl
Sagan who was a friend of Spielberg and of Hoagland, that Carl Sagan
had insider NASA information that he may have whispered into
Spielberg's ear - so to speak - and Steven incorporated that
information in code - secret, occulted, information about Mars at a
time when all of this flap about ETI was not even in vogue, into the
movie Close Encounters...
The complexity of these issues and the
thickening plots are at times difficult to convey. Those of you who
can listen, go to the last part from middle of clip 10 and first part
of clip 11 from the Art Bell archive of the Steven Bassett show from
last night 6/23/02 to hear the parts about Spielberg's new series and
Hoagland mentioned the airline used in Close Encounters was Aries, or
Ares (must watch again to catch the right spelling) either spelling is
synonymous with Mars in Greek astrology and the qabala.
My point in mentioning all this is that Bassett's disclosure 2003 is
to kick start up in August, and it seems from what was said last night
that MANY pro disclosure movements are positioning themselves for an
early 2003 major event.
I hope they are right, and it all comes out!
Art Bell Show
06/23/02 - Sun/Mon
The show last night was very interesting.
In August there will be the most
interesting times yet, with Bassett more or less making the media
sit up and listen. His candidacy will be the first time ET will be
the base of his platform as an independent from Maryland.
If you can, please take the time to listen
to this show. Richard Hoagland was on with Bassett and Barbara
Simpson (host). Richard announced his 110% support for Bassett, and
is also contributing the maximum amount of funding allowed
before Bassett is put on the ballot - 1,000 dollars. So Hoagland is
putting his money where his mouth is!
This is getting even more exciting.
Mission to Mars Reports
Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:25 PM
has a Good Case: "Detrimental Reliance"
In 2001, NASA offered the FACETS
group the opportunity to point out to NASA the top 10 sites, to
re-image what Hoagland's team deems the most important artifacts on
Mars. However, NASA reneged on their offer. So now the FACETS lawyer
Peter A. Gersten and Richard C. Hoagland apparently feel compelled
to bring a lawsuit against NASA for this breach in their written
contractual agreement, calling it "Detrimental Reliance".
It is a suit that NASA most likely can ill afford to undergo. Some
very mysterious signals are coming out of NASA that sound a lot like
Disclosure is imminent.
All of this flap is in
reference to these Letters:
Richard C. Hoagland last night on
"My source is telling me tonight,
6/28/02, that the basic word has been given to cooperate. In other
words, if you're going to make the BIG announcement, what you have
to do on NASA's part is sew up a lot of loose ends, a lot of hurt
feelings, a lot of ignored scientists, just a lot of people, like
people in the Enterprise conference who are hanging on every word
right now, who are part of the grassroots citizenry effort to get at
It should be noted that the Odyssey
Mission photographs of the official NASA images of the region
known as Cydonia have still not yet been released. It is the
speculative conclusion of Hoagland and Gersten that NASA is
withholding the images while it readies a Disclosure, of whatever
size and form, of its own. And in the long run, this is good news
all around. The only troubling aspect is regarding the timing, since
this announcement and the subsequent revelations may have to wait
until next year. If so, that may coincide nicely with several other
converging, grassroots Disclosure platforms all headed to
There will be a FACETS conference call
with NASA again on Monday. At that time we will hear more from
Hoagland and Gersten on this escalating scenario.
Saturday, June 22, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: To see the same Moon,
the same Mars, at last
If Richard Hoagland http://www.enterprisemission.com/bismark.htm
(scroll to middle) is right, his
goal - to rediscover what the parallel space program
knows; a program that stopped sharing it's fantastic findings with
the American public over 30 years ago, we may finally get to see
what's been withheld from the public at large. Finally fixing
that wrong, together, we can move on into our belated future. To
see the same Moon, the same Mars, at last.
informed us that the highest levels of government were convinced
they were powerless to deter the objects from their path (just as
we had suspected and just as was recently portrayed in the
He added that he agreed with our stance that
there were technologies which could avert the disaster, but that
those who were in possession of those technologies had decided
that there was "too much inertia" in favor of not
using those technologies.
In other words, somebody
wants these impacts to happen.